Reading time: 2 minutes
What does the image show?
The chart shows the average number of days worked from home by respondents in each of our survey sites. The data shows very significant increases from pre-pandemic levels where London was the highest with an average of 0.78 days per week. In June 2020 this was as high as 3.54 in London and 3.36 in Bristol. By October, the levels had fallen back somewhat but still remain well above pre-pandemic levels.
Why is this important?
It is well understood that it is easier for employees in some industries to work from home. Different places have different industrial structures and therefore are seeing quite different work from home behaviours. This was true before the pandemic but the scale of difference was not so visible.
As the economy opens up people who have been working from home will start to go back to work more often. However, there will be reductions in commuting and this will impact on the viability of public transport. It seems likely that the return to work will also be uneven across places. This may mean different levels of support are required to maintain service frequencies and fares as travel patterns adjust.
Column graph shows the differences in days worked from home before the pandemic, during the lockdown and in October 2020, for places across the UK. Pre-pandemic, people worked less than a day a week on average from home, with the highest level in London (0.78) and the lowest in Aberdeen (0.33). During lockdown, the numbers increased to 3.54 days per week in London, 3.36 days in Bristol and 3.29 days in Edinburgh. The lowest rate during this phase was 2.25 days in Lancashire and 2.27 days in Manchester. In October 2020, many people were still working from home – in London, people worked 2.83 days a week, Ednibrugh 2.35, Bristol 2.5 and Manchester 2.27. The lowest number working from home in October was in Lancashire (1.61 days) and Aberdeen (1.63 days).